Browster is another one of the lacking companies that I’ve
grouped as “ethically challenged.” That group includes folks like
Vibrant Media
which tries to sell ads inside a journalist’s stories,
BzzAgent which according
to the NYT is incentives folks to deceive their friends, and
Marc Canter having
that Canadian company pay folks to blog about them.
Browster shows you a preview of the webpage you’re about to
visit when you mouse over the link. However, they strip out the advertising in
the preview and put their own targeted ads on the top!!!
ILEGAL ILLEGAL ILEGAL!!!
UNETHICAL UNETHICAL UNETHICAL!!!
RUDE RUDE RUDE!!!
Don’t people remember the TotalNews case where people framed
other people’s site?
Google shows an excerpt of a pages content—NOT THE WHOLE
PAGE!!! People grant them the fair use of 50 words of content in exchange for
the link. It’s a fair deal, and you can opt out of it. This company is not
sending people to your site—they are keeping them from coming, blocking your
ads, and piggybacking on your hard work to make money!
The reason the ads are turned off is because their preview
window is clearly turning off Javascript—which is how ads are loaded on the
Internet 99% of the time. Now, I understand why they turn off Javascript: people
put Javascript on their sites to turn off framing.
Uhhh… hey guys, if I don’t want my page framed and use
Javascript to stop it then please have some respect for my decision!
I was shocked as the spokesperson for this company sat there
explaining with glee that he was going to make money off of other folks
websites—this guy had no clue!
I’ll be writing more about this and I’m going to find this
guy and let him know exactly what he needs to do to be legal:
1. get
permission in advance
or
2. use just an excerpt of the page (which makes him google
in annoying popup format)